We commend him to you as the answer to your life’s deepest needs and questions.
Please be sure to have a look at the "Who is Jesus" presentation.
HE WAS WOUNDED
BY H.A. CAMERON
"It was the sight of Thy dear cross
Wounds, according to the definition of the surgeon, are divisions of the soft parts of the body by a mechanical force applied externally, and they are classified by their different characteristics as (1) contused, (2) lacerated, (3) penetrating and (5) incised wounds. It is remarkable that in the simple statement, "He was wounded" (Isa. 53:5), there is included each kind of wound, as we may readily see from the examination of the scriptural records concerning the sufferings of our Lord Jesus Christ.
(1) The contused wound, a wound produced by a blunt instrument. Such would result from a blow by the rod, as foretold in Micah 5:1, "They shall smite the Judge of Israel with a rod upon the cheek," and fulfilled, as recorded in Matthew 26:67, "They smote Him with rods" (Newberry margin), Matthew 27:30, "they took the reed, and smote Him on the head," and John 18:22, "one of the officers struck Him with a rod" (Newberry margin).
(2) The lacerated wound, a wound produced by a tearing instrument. Laceration of the tissues was the result of scourging, and scourging had become a fine art among the Romans at the time of the Lord's submission to its infliction. The Roman scourge was a many-tailed lash, each thong tipped with metal or ivory, so that, in the hands of a cruel expert, the sufferer might truly say, "The plowers plowed upon my back. They made long their furrows" (Psa. 129:3). The torture, the laceration, and the consequent loss of blood, often resulted in the death of the victim, but scourging, while part of our Lord's sufferings, was not to be the means of His death. Thus the prophetic word of Isaiah 50:6, "I gave my back to the smiters," finds its fulfilment as recorded in Matthew 27:26, and in John 19:1, where we read, "Then Pilate therefore took Jesus and scourged Him." And let us remember that upon His back, thus lacerated, the cross was laid as he went forth to the place called Calvary.
(3) The penetrating wound, a deep wound caused by a sharp
pointed instrument. This we have exemplified in the wounds upon the head, produced
by the crown of thorns. The Jerusalem thorn, from which
(4) The perforating wound, from the Latin word, meaning to 'pierce through,' "They pierced My hands and My feet" (Psalm 22:16). The iron spikes were driven between the bones, separating but not breaking them. Crucifixion was not practiced as a means of capital punishment among the Jews, and the words of Psalm 22 must even have puzzled the writer, but at that early date, God was thereby 'signifying what death He would die,' for to Him, who knows the end from the beginning, the Roman subjugation of the Jews at the time of Messiah's advent, and His 'cutting off' by the excruciatingly painful death of crucifixion, were all foreknown. Yea, and to our Lord by anticipation and at last in fearful reality, "The decease which He should accomplish at Jerusalem" was a matter of perfect knowledge. The prophetic words of Isaiah 53 were ever before Him, "He was wounded... He was bruised," and thus we can truly sing,
"T'was love that sought
(5) The incised wound, A cut produced by a sharp edged instrument. "But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced His side, and forthwith came there out blood and water" (John 19:34). This wound was inflicted after the death of the Lord Jesus, inflicted by the practiced hand of the Roman soldier to make certain that whatever vestige of life was present would be extinguished, but while it did not cause death in His case, it is an assurance to all men that death had actually occurred, and it is also a fulfilment of the Scripture which saith, "They shall look on Him whom they pierced."
From that wound, so large that Thomas could have thrust his hand into it, "Came there out blood and water. And he that saw it bear record and his record is true." This wonderful sight awakened surprise and deep interest in John and may surely engage our attention also, namely the water that flowed from the pericardium and the blood that flowed from the heart. The pericardium is a closed sac encasing the heart and lubricated by a small amount of fluid (about a teaspoonful) to facilitate the motion of the heart. How could John, it may be asked, distinguish such a small quantity of water? In answer, let me quote a significant statement from a standard work of pathology, "The normal amount of the pericardial fluid is about a teaspoonful, but it may be increased to 100 c.c. (24 teaspoonfuls) where the death agony is prolonged." Here then is a possible explanation. The water bears mute testimony to the intense suffering of our Lord Jesus Christ. And what shall we say to the fact that, contrary to nature, blood flowed from One who had died? Is it not to show that in death, "He vanquished death and did not see corruption?" Thus the last wound, the last indignity offered to the body prepared for Him, proclaims both purification and redemption for, "The very spear that pierced His side, drew forth the blood to save."
Israel is described in Isaiah 1:6 as exhibiting to God's eye "From the sole of the foot even unto the head... wounds," and our Lord Jesus Christ, in submitting to this perfection of wounding from head to foot, was made in this sense like unto His brethren and 'perfect through sufferings' (Heb. 2:10).
May the contemplation of these wounds, whereby His body was broken and His blood was shed, deepen our love for Him who was "wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities," and cause each of us, like Thomas, to worship and acclaim Him as "My Lord and My God" (John 21:28).
"It was the sight of Thy dear cross
Sermons | Articles